---

Spray Balls for CIP Tank Cleaning: Principles, Types, Selection & Design Guidelines

Follow us on Twitter 
Question, remark ? Contact us at contact@myengineeringtools.com

---

1. Introduction
2. Working principle of spray balls

3. Main types of spray balls

4. Selecting the right spray ball – decision factors

5. Spray ball choice and design procedure

6. Core placement principles

---

1. Introduction

In food‑and‑beverage production, keeping every surface inside a tank or pipe spotless isn’t just good housekeeping—it’s a regulatory and safety imperative. Whether you’re switching recipes, running a continuous line, or shutting down for the weekend, any residue left behind can seed spoilage, trigger cross‑contamination, or even cause costly product recalls.

Relying on manual scrubbing and disassembly works for tiny pilot plants, but as soon as cleaning frequency climbs the labor bill, downtime swells, and the risk of missed spots rises, operators turn to Cleaning‑In‑Place (CIP). A well‑designed CIP system lets you flood the vessel with high‑velocity spray‑ball jets, generate the shear needed to strip stubborn fouling, and flush everything out without ever opening the tank.

The following article walks you through the core concepts that make a spray‑ball CIP effective—working principle, main ball types, how to pick the right one for a given tank, and the key design parameters (pressure, flow, placement, validation) that turn theory into reliable, repeatable cleaning performance.

2. Working principle of spray balls

Step	Description
Pressurisation	Cleaning fluid is pumped into the spray‑ball inlet at 1 – 5 bar (15 – 70 psi) for most static or turbine‑driven designs. Higher‑pressure units (up to 10 bar) exist for very heavy fouling, but they are the exception rather than the rule.
Flow distribution	Internal manifolds split the incoming flow into a series of identical orifices.
Atomisation / jet formation	Each orifice creates a high‑velocity jet that forms a cone or flat‑fan spray.
Rotation (if applicable)	In turbine‑driven balls the fluid’s kinetic energy spins a small rotor, sweeping the spray pattern 360° around the vessel.
Impact & turbulence	Jets strike the wall, producing shear stresses of 30 – 70 Pa – enough to break up bio‑films, protein deposits, and other fouling layers (note : 30–70 Pa is an indicative design target, but real validation is by ATP/protein assays)
Recirculation	The spent cleaning fluid drains back to the CIP system for reuse or disposal, completing the closed‑loop cycle.

3. Main types of spray balls

Type	Key features	Typical applications	Advantages	Limitations
Rotating (turbine‑driven)	Fluid‑driven rotor gives a continuous 360° sweep; available as full‑cone or flat‑fan.	Large dairy, beverage, pharma tanks where uniform coverage is critical.	Excellent coverage, self‑cleaning rotor, virtually no dead zones.	Requires slightly higher inlet pressure (≈ 2–5 bar); bearings/turbine wear over time.
Static (fixed‑pattern)	Fixed nozzles produce a static spray pattern (6‑, 8‑, or 12‑directional).	Small‑to‑medium tanks, batch reactors, where rotation isn’t needed.	Simpler design, lower cost, lower pressure demand.	Potential dead zones if the ball is poorly positioned or if internals block the spray.
Multi‑jet	Several concentric rings of nozzles, each with its own spray angle.	High‑throughput CIP lines, heat exchangers, vessels with complex internals.	Tailorable spray density, can target hard‑to‑reach zones.	More complex, higher risk of clogging if water quality is poor.
Sanitary / hygienic	Polished 304/316 L stainless steel, sanitary seals (ISO 14644‑1, 3A).	Pharmaceutical, biotech, food‑grade tanks.	Meets GMP/HACCP standards, easy to sterilise.	Typically higher capital cost.

Typical Inlet Pressures of spray balls

Spray‑ball type	Usual inlet pressure range*	Equivalent in psi	Typical source
Static (fixed‑pattern) spray balls	1 – 5 bar	15 – 70 psi	Eagle Fittings (static‑ball spec)
Rotating (turbine‑driven) spray balls	2 – 10 bar (most standard units operate around 3 – 7 bar)	30 – 145 psi	Eagle Fittings (rotary‑ball spec)
Alfa Laval rotary spray heads (commonly used in food‑beverage)	5 – 7 bar (inlet)	~73 – 102 psi	Alfa Laval Q&A
General commercial spray balls (e.g., St. Pat’s, home‑brew kits)	15 – 30 psi (≈ 1 – 2 bar)	15 – 30 psi	HomebrewTalk discussion
Sanimatic catalog (standard design flow)	25 psi (≈ 1.7 bar) – up to 70 psi (≈ 4.8 bar)	25 – 70 psi	Sanimatic product sheet

4. Selecting the right spray ball – decision factors

1. Tank geometry & size

   • Aspect ratio (height ÷ diameter) – tall, slender tanks favour rotating balls; shallow, wide vessels work well with static balls.
   • Internals (baffles, agitators, spargers) create shadow zones – consider multi‑jet or rotating designs to mitigate.

2. Cleaning‑fluid characteristics

   • Viscosity & temperature – high‑temp or viscous solutions need larger orifices to keep pressure drop reasonable.
   • Detergent / sanitizer aggressiveness – select corrosion‑resistant alloys (316 L, Hastelloy) for strong chemicals.

3. Required shear stress & flow rate

   • Target shear: 30 – 70 Pa (typical for protein, bio‑film, and mineral scale removal) (30–70 Pa is an indicative design target, but real validation is by ATP/protein assays)
   • Flow rule of thumb: 3 gpm per foot of tank circumference for static balls, 1.5 gpm per foot for rotating balls.

4. Regulatory & hygienic requirements

   • Pharma/GMP – must satisfy USP <61>/<62>, EU Annex 1, ISO 14644‑1 Class 3. Choose sanitary‑rated balls with polished surfaces and validated cleanability.

5. Maintenance & reliability

   • Clogging risk – if water quality varies, opt for larger orifices or self‑flushing designs.
   • Wear parts – rotating balls have bearings/turbines that need periodic replacement; static balls have none.

6. Cost & lifecycle considerations

   • Capital vs. operating cost – rotating balls are pricier up‑front but can cut cleaning time and labor, lowering total cost of ownership.

Key design parameters for efficient CIP with spray balls

Parameter	Typical range / guideline	How it impacts performance
Inlet pressure	1 – 5 bar (15 – 70 psi) – most common; up to 10 bar only for heavy fouling.	Higher pressure → finer droplets & higher shear, but also higher pump energy and wear.
Orifice diameter	0.5 – 2 mm (selected to match flow & pressure).	Smaller → finer spray, higher pressure drop; larger → robust operation, coarser spray.
Number of nozzles	6 – 24 per ball (scaled to tank size).	More nozzles improve coverage but raise blockage risk; balance with flow capacity.
Spray angle	30° – 120° (cone) or 180° (flat‑fan).	Wider angles increase wall coverage; narrow cones give deeper penetration.
Rotation speed (rotating balls)	300 – 1 200 rpm (fluid‑driven).	Faster rotation = more uniform coverage, but higher bearing wear.
Residence time	5 – 15 min per cleaning cycle (soil dependent).	Must be long enough for chemical action; flow can be adjusted to meet the target.
Water quality	Hardness < 100 ppm, filtered to ≤ 5 µm.	Prevents scaling/clogging; inline filtration is strongly recommended.
Material	316 L SS (or PTFE‑lined for aggressive cleaners).	Ensures compliance with sanitary standards and long life.
Mounting position	Centered vertically; offset if baffles/agitator create shadows.	Proper placement avoids dead zones and yields symmetric spray.
Cleaning validation	ATP, protein assay, or visual inspection.	Confirms that the design meets hygiene specifications.

5. Spray ball choice and design procedure

Information to collect before sizing a spray‑ball CIP system

Item	What to record	Why it matters
Tank geometry – inner diameter D (m) and height H (m)	Determines surface area and circumference.	The surface area dictates the total cleaning load, while the circumference is used directly in the flow‑rate formulas (gpm / ft of circumference).
Internal obstacles – agitator shafts, baffles, spargers, manways	Create “shadow zones” that may need extra balls or a rotating device.	Obstructions block spray paths; without accounting for them you can end up with dead spots where fouling remains.
Soil type – light (protein, sugar), medium (fat, starch), heavy (bio‑film, mineral scale)	Influences required shear stress and thus pressure/flow.	Heavier soils need higher wall shear (≈ 30‑70 Pa) → higher inlet pressure or a rotating ball that delivers more impingement.
Cleaning solution – temperature, viscosity, chemical aggressiveness	Affects pump power and allowable pressure.	Hot, low‑viscosity solutions flow easier; highly viscous or aggressive chemicals may limit the maximum safe pressure and dictate material selection.
Available CIP pump – max pressure Pmax (bar) and max flow Qmax (L min⁻¹)	Sets the envelope for the design.	The pump must be able to meet the combined flow‑rate and pressure demanded by the selected spray‑ball configuration; otherwise you must down‑size the number of balls or raise the pressure rating.
Regulatory class – food, pharma (3‑A, EHEDG)	Drives material choice (304 vs 316L) and minimum pressure (≥ 1 bar).	Pharma/3‑A applications require 316L stainless steel, tighter surface‑finish tolerances, and often a minimum inlet pressure to guarantee turbulent flow for validation.

Choose the Spray‑Ball Family

Rule of thumb: Start with the lowest pressure that still meets the required shear (≈ 30 Pa). Increase only if cleaning validation fails.

---

Determine the Required Flow Rate

Two widely accepted empirical rules are used in the industry:

1. Static spray balls – 3 gpm per foot of tank circumference
2. Rotating spray balls – 1.5 gpm per foot of circumference at ≥ 60 psi (≈ 4 bar)

Foot = 0.3048 m. Convert to metric when needed.

Compute Tank Circumference

[ C = \pi D \quad (\text{m}) ]

Convert to feet:

[ C_{\text{ft}} = \frac{C}{0.3048} ]

Apply the rule

For a static ball:

[ Q_{\text{req}} = 3 \times C_{\text{ft}};\text{gpm} ]

For a rotating ball:

[ Q_{\text{req}} = 1.5 \times C_{\text{ft}};\text{gpm} ]

Convert to L min⁻¹

[ 1;\text{gpm}= 3.785;\text{L min}^{-1} ]

[ Q_{\text{L/min}} = Q_{\text{gpm}} \times 3.785 ]

---

Size the Number of Spray Balls

A single ball is usually adequate for diameters ≤ 1 m (≈ 3 ft) if the pressure is at the high end of the range. For larger tanks, use the following guideline:

Why? Each ball delivers roughly the flow calculated in §3. Adding balls divides the total flow among them, so the per‑ball flow stays within the 3 gpm/ft (static) or 1.5 gpm/ft (rotating) limit.

---

Verify Pressure Drop & Pump Sizing

Estimate Pressure Drop Across the Spray Ball

Vendors typically publish a pressure–flow curve for each spray ball model. These curves must be used for accurate design. As a rough rule of thumb:

A standard static spray ball typically shows a pressure drop of about 1.5–2.0 bar at 40 gpm (≈ 150 L/min). Higher flows will increase the pressure drop, but not quadratically as suggested by simplified formulas.

Total System Pressure

The total inlet pressure required is the sum of the ball pressure drop, piping losses, and a design margin:

\[ P_{\text{inlet}} = \Delta P_{\text{ball}} + \Delta P_{\text{piping}} + \text{margin (≈ 0.5 bar)} \]

• \(\Delta P_{\text{piping}}\) can be estimated with the Darcy–Weisbach equation or obtained from pump-curve software.
• Keep \(P_{\text{inlet}}\) within the spray ball’s rating (see §2) and below the pump’s maximum rated pressure.

Pump Selection

Choose a CIP pump that can deliver the total required flow rate at the calculated inlet pressure. If the pump’s curve shows insufficient flow at the required pressure, either:

• Reduce the number of balls (and increase per-ball flow), only if cleaning validation still passes, or
• Raise the inlet pressure (while staying within the spray ball rating) to achieve the required wall shear.

Example Calculation

Tank: 2 m diameter, 5 m height, no internal baffles. Soil: Medium (protein/fat). Cleaning Device: Static spray balls.

Step 1: Circumference

\[ C = \pi \times 2 = 6.283\;\text{m} \] \[ C_{\text{ft}} = \frac{6.283}{0.3048} \approx 20.6\;\text{ft} \]

Step 2: Flow Requirement (Static Ball Rule)

\[ Q_{\text{gpm}} = 3 \times 20.6 = 61.8\;\text{gpm} \] \[ Q_{\text{L/min}} = 61.8 \times 3.785 \approx 234\;\text{L·min}^{-1} \]

Step 3: Number of Balls

For tanks with diameter > 1.5 m, use 2–3 balls. Select 3 equally spaced balls.

Step 4: Per-Ball Flow

\[ Q_{\text{per-ball}} = \frac{234}{3} = 78\;\text{L·min}^{-1}\;(≈ 21\;\text{gpm}) \]

Step 5: Pressure Drop Estimate

Using vendor data (not the quadratic approximation), a static ball at ~21 gpm shows a pressure drop of about 1.5–1.7 bar.

Step 6: Total Inlet Pressure

Assume piping losses ≈ 0.3 bar and add margin 0.5 bar: \[ P_{\text{inlet}} \approx 1.7 + 0.3 + 0.5 \approx 2.5\;\text{bar}\;(≈ 36\;\text{psi}) \] This lies comfortably within the 1–5 bar operating range of static spray balls.

Step 7: Pump Selection

Select a CIP pump rated for at least: \[ Q \geq 250\;\text{L·min}^{-1}\;\; \text{at}\;\; P \geq 3\;\text{bar}\;(≈ 45\;\text{psi}) \]

Step 8: Validation

Run a cleaning trial, measure wall shear indirectly (e.g., with soil removal or tracer tests), and confirm cleaning performance. If cleaning is insufficient:

• Increase pressure to ~4 bar, or
• Replace one static ball with a rotating ball (which requires only ~1.5 gpm/ft at ≥ 4 bar).

Design‑review checklist (what to verify before commissioning)

✔️ Item	What to verify
Ball type	Matches tank geometry & fouling level (static for simple, rotating for tall/obstructed tanks, high‑impact for heavy soils).
Number of balls	Provides full 360° coverage (no dead zones) – spacing roughly 120° for three‑ball layouts, or opposite ends for two‑ball setups.
Per‑ball flow	Satisfies the empirical rule: 3 gpm / ft of circumference for static balls, 1.5 gpm / ft for rotating balls (converted to L min⁻¹).
Inlet pressure	Is ≤ the spray‑ball’s rated maximum and ≤ the pump’s Pmax; also high enough to generate the required wall shear (≈ 30‑70 Pa).
Material (304 vs 316L)	Complies with the regulatory class (316L for pharma/3‑A, 304 acceptable for most food‑grade applications).
Installation – balls centered, clearance ≥ 2 × ball diameter from agitator shafts	Guarantees unrestricted spray rotation and prevents mechanical interference that could cause wear or dead zones.
Cleaning validation – ATP, protein assay, or visual inspection passed	Demonstrates that the chosen configuration actually removes the target soil to the required level; required for GMP/3‑A qualification.
Maintenance plan – schedule for nozzle inspection, bearing lubrication (rotating), and periodic pressure‑drop checks	Ensures long‑term reliability; clogged nozzles or worn bearings reduce flow and shear, compromising cleaning efficacy.

6. Core placement principles

Placement zone	When it works best	How to orient the ball	Why it matters (performance impact)
Top‑center (near the head)	Small‑to‑medium vertical cylinders (≤ 2 m tall) with little internal hardware.	Aim the spray cone downward (180°‑coverage) or use a 270°/360° ball that points both down and sideways.	Gravity assists the cleaning film; the jet hits the wall early, creating a high‑shear “sheet” that runs down the side.
Mid‑height, offset from the centerline	Tall tanks (> 3 m) or vessels with a central agitator shaft that blocks a top‑center ball.	Use a rotating ball so the jet sweeps around the shaft, or mount a static ball on a side‑mounted “T‑fitting” that points radially outward.	Off‑axis placement avoids shadow zones caused by the agitator and improves coverage of the upper half of the wall.
Bottom‑near the drain	Vessels with long dwell times for heavy soils (e.g., fermenters, mash‑tuns) where residue settles.	Install a retractable or low‑profile ball that points upward (180°‑upward) or a 360° ball that sprays both up and sideways.	The upward jet lifts settled solids, preventing “pockets” at the base that are hard to rinse.
Side‑wall (mid‑section)	Tanks that have large protrusions (baffles, spargers) that block a single central jet.	Mount a static ball on a side flange, angled to sweep the wall segment that is hidden from the top ball.	Provides targeted cleaning of “blind spots” without needing extra pumps.
Multiple‑ball arrays	Any tank larger than ≈ 1.5 m diameter or with complex internals.	Distribute balls evenly around the circumference (≈ 120° spacing for three balls) and stagger vertically (top‑mid‑bottom).	Guarantees 360° coverage and redundancy—if one ball clogs, the others still clean most of the surface.

Key take‑away:

• Start with a top‑center ball for simple geometry.
• Add side or bottom balls whenever internal hardware creates “shadow zones.”
• Rotate the ball (or use a rotating‑type spray ball) when a central shaft or baffle blocks the spray path.

These recommendations come from industry‑wide design guidance that stresses the need to align the spray pattern with the vessel’s geometry and internal obstacles.

---

Retractable / “through‑agitator” spray‑ball options

Model family	Typical use case	How it works	Advantages / notes
Retractable (pop‑out) static balls	Fermenters, bioreactors, or mixers where the agitator shaft runs through the tank head.	The ball is mounted on a spring‑loaded sleeve that can be pulled out of the way for maintenance or to clear the agitator hub. When re‑inserted, a seal prevents leakage.	Easy to service; maintains a sealed CIP loop; suitable for pressures up to 5 bar (static).
Rotating‑ball with shaft‑pass‑through bore	Large tanks with a permanent agitator shaft that cannot be removed.	The ball incorporates a hollow central bore (typically 1‑2 in.) that aligns with the agitator shaft, allowing the ball to spin around the shaft while staying sealed.	Provides full 360° spray despite the shaft; higher impact due to rotation; rated up to 8‑10 bar for heavy fouling.
Telescopic / slide‑in spray heads	Vessels that need occasional removal for cleaning of the spray head itself (e.g., breweries with frequent CIP).	The spray head slides on a rail inside the tank head; a quick‑release latch lets operators pull it out for inspection.	Reduces downtime; can be swapped for different nozzle patterns without opening the tank.
Clamp‑end / “TC” spray balls with removable caps	Smaller batch reactors where space is limited.	The ball is clamped onto a pipe stub; the cap can be unscrewed to expose the interior for cleaning.	Low cost; works well for pressures up to 4 bar; good for disposable or low‑volume operations.

Manufacturers such as Lee Industries, Glacier Tanks, and Ss Brewtech list these configurations in their CIP‑design literature

---

Quick “rule‑of‑thumb” checklist for positioning

1. Map the interior – draw a simple sketch showing the tank diameter, height, agitator shaft, baffles, and any protruding fittings.
2. Place a primary ball at the top‑center unless the agitator head blocks it.
3. Check for blind spots (areas behind shafts, under baffles, or at the bottom). Add a side or bottom ball for each blind spot.
4. Select ball type – static for simple geometry, rotating for shafts/baffles, high‑pressure rotary for heavy soils.
5. Confirm clearance – the ball’s outer diameter must be at least 2 × the distance from the tank wall to any nearby obstruction.
6. Validate flow – ensure the combined flow of all balls meets the 3 gpm/ft (static) or 1.5 gpm/ft (rotating) rule.
7. Choose retractable design if the ball interferes with routine maintenance or if the agitator cannot be removed.

---

Example layout for a typical 3 m‑diameter, 6 m‑tall fermenter with a central agitator

Position	Ball type	Quantity	Orientation	Reason
Top‑center (just below head)	Rotating (turbine‑driven)	1	360° sweep	Agitator shaft blocks static spray; rotation clears the shaft’s shadow.
Mid‑height, side‑mount (120° apart)	Static, 270° coverage	2	Angled outward	Covers the upper‑half wall behind the shaft and baffles.
Bottom‑near drain	Retractable static (pop‑out)	1	180° upward	Lifts settled solids; can be retracted for drain‑plug removal.
Total flow (assuming 20 ft circumference)	—	—	—	3 gpm × 20 ft = 60 gpm ≈ 227 L min⁻¹, split among 4 balls (~57 L min⁻¹ each).
Inlet pressure	—	—	—	2.5 bar (≈ 36 psi) satisfies 1‑5 bar rating for static balls and is safe for the rotating ball.

#	Source description	URL
0	Lee Industries – “9 Vessel Design Factors that Dramatically Affect CIP Performance” (covers spray‑ball placement, pressure ranges, static vs. rotating types, and retractable designs)	https://www.leeind.com/blog/equipment-design/9-vessel-design-factors-that-dramatically-affect-cip-performance
1	Glacier Tanks – “CIP Spray Balls	Rotating & Fixed” (overview of static, rotating, multi‑jet, air‑assisted, and sanitary spray balls)
2	Sanimatic – “Spray Ball Types: How to Select the Right One for Your Process” (flow‑rate rule of thumb, nozzle count, spray angles)	https://sanimatic.com/spray-ball-types-how-to-select-the-right-one-for-your-process/
3	Ss Brewtech – CIP Example Build Guide (example of tubing to a 3″ TC spray ball, pump sizing, and pressure recommendations)	https://ssbrewtech.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/4410154515355-CIP-Example-Build-Guide

---